Skip to content

feat: Add comprehensive unit tests for MetricsScoreCircle component#1852

Merged
kasya merged 8 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
shivnshshrma:feat/add-metricsscorecircle-unit-tests
Jul 27, 2025
Merged

feat: Add comprehensive unit tests for MetricsScoreCircle component#1852
kasya merged 8 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
shivnshshrma:feat/add-metricsscorecircle-unit-tests

Conversation

@shivnshshrma
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change
Resolves #1845

This PR adds comprehensive unit tests for the MetricsScoreCircle React component, covering all essential functionality including score-based styling, pulse animations, tooltip integration, edge cases, and accessibility features.

Key additions:

  • 20 test cases covering rendering, conditional logic, and edge cases
  • Proper mocking of @heroui/tooltip dependency
  • Tests for score-based color schemes (red/yellow/green)
  • Validation of pulse animation for low scores (<30)
  • Edge case handling (negative, zero, >100, decimal scores)
  • Accessibility and DOM structure testing
  • All tests pass successfully with comprehensive coverage of component behavior.

Checklist

  • I've read and followed the contributing guidelines.
  • I've run make check-test locally all checks and tests passed.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive unit tests for the MetricsScoreCircle component, covering rendering, styling based on score ranges, animation, tooltip behavior, accessibility, and integration scenarios.

Walkthrough

A new comprehensive unit test suite for the MetricsScoreCircle React component has been added. The tests cover rendering, styling, conditional logic, accessibility, edge cases, tooltip integration, and animation triggers, ensuring the component's behavior aligns with specifications across a wide range of scenarios and input values.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
frontend/tests/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx Added a new test suite for MetricsScoreCircle covering rendering, styling, edge cases, accessibility, tooltip, and animation logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • kasya
  • arkid15r

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b780086 and dd90eea.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/tests/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx (3)

111-149: Excellent edge case coverage with room for optimization.

The edge case tests are comprehensive, covering important scenarios like boundary values, negative numbers, values above 100, and decimal inputs. This ensures robust handling of various input types.

Consider refactoring to eliminate duplicate component renders within individual tests:

it('handles score of 0', () => {
-  render(<MetricsScoreCircle score={0} />)
+  const { container } = render(<MetricsScoreCircle score={0} />)
  expect(screen.getByText('0')).toBeInTheDocument()
  // Should be red styling
-  const { container } = render(<MetricsScoreCircle score={0} />)
  expect(container.querySelector('[class*="bg-red"]')).toBeInTheDocument()
})

Similar optimization can be applied to the other edge case tests that currently render twice.


151-163: Basic accessibility testing with potential for enhancement.

The current accessibility tests provide good coverage of text content accessibility and tooltip presence. Consider expanding accessibility testing to include ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility for more comprehensive accessibility validation.


207-209: Remove trailing empty lines.

Clean up the trailing empty lines at the end of the file for better code hygiene.

})
-

-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 152f2cd and b780086.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/MetricsScoreCircle.test.tsx (8)

1-12: Excellent test setup and mocking strategy.

The imports are appropriate and the mock implementation for the Tooltip component is well-designed. It preserves the original interface while exposing testable attributes through data attributes, enabling proper isolation of the component under test.


14-34: Well-structured basic rendering tests.

These tests effectively verify the core rendering functionality, ensuring the component displays the score value and static labels correctly. The tests are focused and use appropriate assertions.


36-72: Comprehensive styling tests with excellent boundary value coverage.

The tests effectively verify color schemes for different score ranges and include critical boundary value testing. The boundary tests for scores 50, 74, and 75 are particularly valuable for ensuring correct conditional logic.

Consider that the CSS class pattern matching approach ([class*="bg-green"]) assumes specific naming conventions and could be brittle if styling implementation changes, but this is acceptable for the current testing needs.


74-85: Effective animation testing with proper boundary validation.

The tests correctly verify both the presence and absence of pulse animation based on the score threshold of 30. The boundary testing ensures the conditional logic works precisely at the cutoff point.


87-93: Solid tooltip functionality testing.

The test effectively utilizes the mocked Tooltip component to verify both content and placement attributes, ensuring the tooltip integration works as expected.


95-109: Good DOM structure validation.

These tests provide valuable verification of the component's HTML structure and CSS classes, ensuring the layout elements are properly rendered. The combination of screen and container queries is appropriate for testing different aspects of the DOM.


165-172: Appropriate hover effects testing.

The test effectively verifies that hover-related CSS classes are applied to the component, ensuring interactive behavior is present. The CSS class pattern approach is suitable for this level of testing.


174-206: Excellent integration testing approach.

These integration tests are particularly valuable as they verify that all component features (styling, animation, score display, tooltip) work together correctly for different score scenarios. This holistic testing approach ensures the component functions properly as a complete unit.

@kasya
Copy link
Collaborator

kasya commented Jul 26, 2025

@shivnshshrma please run make check command and push any updated files before next round of PR review 👌🏼 The CI\CD checks are failing right now.

@shivnshshrma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shivnshshrma please run make check command and push any updated files before next round of PR review 👌🏼 The CI\CD checks are failing right now.

I think the issue is resolved now
image

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@kasya kasya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These look good now! Thank you @shivnshshrma

@kasya kasya enabled auto-merge July 27, 2025 18:42
@kasya kasya added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into OWASP:main with commit 84c5aad Jul 27, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add tests for <MetricsScoreCircle> component

2 participants